SURPRISE OF OCTOBER 2004

|
To
be honest I don’t see any point in writting this review. First of all
there is nothing new in me writting that the latest album of the band is a
masterpiece, as Fates since 1986 have only released monumental albums -
this couldn’t change now. Second, Fates’ fans have already bought the
album, they don’t wait for any kind of review as new releases from the
band are like oxygen to us. As for those who keep ignoring the band...
well, this is bad for them. After all Fates seem to have understood that
they mark their own lonely way and are not looking for a commercial break
since the “Parallels” album back in the early 90’s. I
think that the band is among the few which push music to the limits, open
new ways, experiment on the edge, without losing the substance of music:
that it is an art created to touch the deepest human feelings. This is
what Fates managed to accomplish all over the years, both with their music
and the lyrics - that seem that band’s members always have a way to find
out what’s happening to our lives. Yet Fates seem to be neglected... as
happens with all great artists during their time. After all they seem to
be so far beyond! Listen for example to “Perfect Symmetry” which was
composed in 1989 and is still considered progressive even for the 00’s. Now, in musical terms the band seems to follow a more direct and heavier path than in its recent past. Without loosing the complicated forms, the tracks seem to be more solid - with a rather clear-cut structure. There aren’t very long songs (like in the “Disconnected” album). Nevertheless the melodies, riffs and drums are still so “twisted” (in the good sense) and neurotic that bare the trademark sound of the band. I could say that this is their most “down to earth” album since “Parallels” (yet so different than that). Forget “pop” progressive and the trend of its mixture with AOR-rock elements. Here we have one of the most intelligent bands ever, which decided to open it heart in order to present its humane look. For reasons I mentioned earlier the mark here has no meaning – it’s just for typical reasons. by Alex Savatianos 9,5/10 |